Quantcast
An educational community
to connect teachers from every level.
Welcome to Teacher Lingo Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
     

Mysterious Teaching

Insights behind the perils of being a teacher

Using the English Language lately?

I have been reading some of the blogs and I have to say I too am disturbed by the lack of correct capitalization in blogging, and writing.  I was taught that there is usually a spoken language that is colloquial and then there is school and written language.  The two often do not match.  However, at school, we sould insist on using correct grammar especially in the writing. 

I also correct my students when they use the language incorrectly.  If teachers don't correct them, no one else is going to.  They really need to know how the language SHOULD be spoken and written.  Someday, these children will be going into business and they will need the language to proceed through the tiers of life.

Advertising also needs to get a hint and spell words correct.  Nothing is more annoying than words  in which the media use to attract the young people (and older people too) by changing the spelling to short versions.  Like LUV!  How are our children supposed to know that the language is not spelled that way when the media flaunts it that way constantly?

Text messaging is creating an entirely new form of the language.  I do understand that because it is expensive to text.  But, when they are not texting, they should be required to write the English language correctly. 

I know our language changes.  They added ginormous to the dictionary recently. (did I spell that right?)  But that doesn't excuse lack of capitals, punctuation, and correct spelling of words.

How do you all feel about that?  Am I the only one who is apparantly living in the past?

Published Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:59 AM by MysteryTeacher
Filed under:

Comments

 

jtspencer said:

If I do that when I blog, will you correct me?

It seems to be that a negative byproduct of technology is that it cheapens everything.  A hand-crafted shirt is better quality than something made in a factory in Indonesia.  A hand-written note is typically more thoughtful than an e-mail.  My wife's cooking will always trump anything from a chain restaurant.  

Blogging, text messaging and discussion boards have a way of cheapening the level of discourse in terms of content, grammar and mechanics.  Due to the nature of the medium (convenient, fast, disposable) people are simply not as careful as they would be writing something out by hand.  

July 27, 2007 3:45 PM
 

MysteryTeacher said:

No, I expect each teacher to enjoy blogging and do as they see fit.  I am just hoping that it doesn't extend into the professional (there's that word again) world.  I have seen teachers, mostly young ones, who do this.  I just looks bad when a school teacher can't remember to use capitals.

July 27, 2007 4:54 PM
 

mz.w said:

a blog is a journal or diary. it is personal and public at the same time. i'm not on this site for professional development. this isn't part of a class assignment. i do this because i want to. therefore, if i so choose to flout written conventions i will. i am an adult who knows the time and place to use proper english. not to mention, many people are not necessarily well-written by nature or training and write in haste to get their thoughts out w/out proof-reading. my roommate is a math teacher. she is not the best writer or speller out there. in her professional life, she takes great pains to make sure that she is doing things properly. if she was on this site, it probably wouldn't be the same.

i make a conscious decision to post w/out caps and to abreviate. sometimes it is for ease of thought, as well as a stylistic decision.

a blog is a conversation. our conversation is notoriously casual.

i suggest that age has nothing to do w/it. older staff at my school send out casual emails w/ every disregard to written conventions that you have mentioned. well, they do tend to avoid LUV;)

as long as one can code-switch, i see no problem w/any of this.  

July 28, 2007 12:56 AM
 

mz.w said:

the language of text is also meant to throw one over on the adults. i can't tell you how surprised the kids are sometimes when i can figure out what they have messaged each other or posted on their myspace pages.

i liken the text situation to back in the day when there weren't standarized spellings. the use of L33T and other youth tech speak has added a whole new dimension w/the addition of symbols in place of words and letters that wouldn't be possible except for the technology.

July 28, 2007 1:02 AM
 

jtspencer said:

I see a value in using many different forms of lanugage registers.  What is important is that students learn when it is appropriate.  Text messages are fine between friends.  Actually, text language can be real effecient and I think students have used some of the abreviations for notes.  What they need to learn is when to use formal language, casual language, business language, technical language and academic language.  I'm not sure they always learn the differences.  

July 28, 2007 8:40 AM
 

jwag2005 said:

I'm just a stick in the mud. I've been online now for over a decade. It drives me crazy when people use shorthand in communications of any sort. What really gets me is that I have literally heard a few people say things like "LOL" and "OMG" in everyday conversation. That cracks me up instead of annoying me. I've also seen kids write the :) smiley in notes rather than the more traditional upright smiley face.

July 30, 2007 10:46 PM
 

txteacher said:

I feel your pain. I like for students to be versed in all forms of communication, and texting does come in handy when taking notes from a lecture. However, I have had numerous Sr. level students believe that "LUV," "CUZ," and similar abreviations are actual words. I have seen them in essays and research papers, and yes, it irritates the "U no wat" out of me (lol). But hey, it is my job to teach them the differences between the many forms of communication. I just hope that it sinks in "CUZ" I don't want to pick up a news paper when I'm retired and 75 only to have trouble reaing it because it's written in text.  

July 30, 2007 11:33 PM
 

txteacher said:

I feel your pain. I like for students to be versed in all forms of communication, and texting does come in handy when taking notes from a lecture. However, I have had numerous Sr. level students believe that "LUV," "CUZ," and similar abreviations are actual words. I have seen them in essays and research papers, and yes, it irritates the "U no wat" out of me (lol). But hey, it is my job to teach them the differences between the many forms of communication. I just hope that it sinks in "CUZ" I don't want to pick up a news paper when I'm retired and 75 only to have trouble reaing it because it's written in text.  

July 30, 2007 11:35 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled. 


About MysteryTeacher

I am a wild, whacky, weird, wonderful woman and teacher. I am venturing into a previous life by teaching ELL this fall. I use to teach ESL years ago. I am excited, empowered, and employed. I love life.

This Blog

Sponsored Links

Syndication